Monday, January 30, 2017

Love Is The New Hate

Is whistling at a woman a hate crime? In Scotland, they are discussing exactly that.

Makes perfect sense. If you protect women as a group, any offense directed at a woman can be construed as a bias crime. Remember, women can do anything men can do, except withstand unwanted attention.

When we unleashed the sexual revolution, we swept away the informal institution known as chivalry. Women wanted to do away with chivalry because they thought it imposed a behavior code on them. Chivalry was actually a code of behavior for men.

So instead of an informal code that men enforce on each other, women want a formal code imposed by the government. One problem there, is that assumes a beneficent government. Hasn't always been that way, and won't always be that way.

But let's say they do criminalize the wolf-whistle, and the cat-call. I can think of a dozen ways that men signal their appreciation for the way a woman looks.

There is air-kissing, grunting, moaning, and the male gaze. Will we get to the point where unwanted looks are an infraction?

All of this discussion involves something that is really a speech issue. The axiom is that you counter offensive speech with more speech.

The burka is also speech.

Friday, January 27, 2017

March For Life

I spent a good portion of my morning pushing back against women spamming the #MarchForLife hashtag. I guess it makes me angry that people would flood the hashtag with their rationalizations, but I spam regressive hashtags, too. It got tiresome quickly, because I realized how pointless it all is. Arguing with women is pointless to begin with, because they rely on situational ethics and relative morality. You literally cannot get someone to admit that abortion amounts to taking a life without due process. I found there were some talking points that kept coming up.
This is a very common talking point. You say you are pro-life but you are anti-immigrant. You don't want to let in Syrian refugees. Right, but I don't want to murder refugees that apply here. Somehow if we say "no" to a Syrian refugee, we are signing their death warrants. I guess Laura hadn't heard that "refugees" are taking their welfare benefits back to the countries they fled from and having a holiday there.Unborn babies are equivalent to people who commit pre-meditated murder?
This last one is a variation on George Carlin's talking points about conservatives, that they don't care about you until you reach military age.Planned Parenthood can't possibly get more despicable, can they? Well, calling today's march the #MarchOfLies is pretty shameful. Life is a lie?I get that there are too many children in poverty, and foster care, but somehow the solution is to liquidate them before it causes such pangs to our consciences?

I know that today I should celebrate all the people who sacrificed their comfort to speak for those who cannot. I guess my heart is also really full of hatred for those who excuse the barbarity. I walk around in my daily life and when I see a young woman, I think to myself, she has probably had an abortion, and maybe she did feel relief and not shame. I'm supposed to feel good that so many women value the fruit of their womb so lightly? How?

The Fourteen Words

No, not those fourteen. These fourteen: The sexual revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

Nowhere is this disaster more luridly depicted than in today's women's magazines. A generation of J-school infiltrators have put regressive politics into the glossy, sickly-sweet pages. Cosmopolitan features an article entitled, How This College Student Became a Successful Porn Star Overnight.

Cosmopolitan magazine used to have cover stories like, "Take The Time To Learn Ten Ways To Please Your Man." Apparently they've scaled up, because now it's click-bait like, How This One Weird Trick Helps You Please Ten Men At A Time.

They interviewed a 25-year-old woman stage-named Carter Cruise, who has already been in 176 "adult films." She refers to this concept of "branding" herself.

"I came up with this idea to create this brand of "Carter Cruise" where I could do everything I wanted to do. I wanted to write, I wanted to act, I wanted to make music, I wanted to do fashion."

If you have done nearly two hundred "adult films," your brand is set in stone. You're a whore. Any man who meets you and is smart enough to do a reverse image search on you will run in the opposite direction.

According to Cruise, her "dad is the biggest feminist," and supports her. We'll have to take her word for it, I guess. He probably came to a crossroads and realized that he couldn't stop her, so his choice was between supporting her and losing her, and possibly his wife, too.

If "cuckold" is the pejorative for a man who "supports" his wife sleeping with other men, then, there should be a pejorative for a father like this. Piece of shit, probably. Whatever it is, it's a general unwillingness to protect his daughter.

While Cruise was growing up, her father introduced her to "women CEOs, writers [and] architects," in the hopes of enabling her empowerment. But somehow the message got lost, and she equates prostitution with empowerment.

Maybe she told her father that she's building a brand, like Kim Kardashian, or Paris Hilton. But they were already well-connected before they did their sex tapes, and they only did one. Not two hundred. Or maybe she's convinced herself that she will become the next Jenna Jameson, the so-called Queen Of Porn. Despite her "royal" status, Jameson hasn't accomplished anything outside the pornography industry.

Cruise's Wikipedia page lists her as "brand ambassador" to a gonzo production company known as Airerose Entertainment. What is "gonzo?" Gonzo is way out there. Simulated rape, double anal penetration, really the leading edge of cruelty and suffering. Hooray empowerment.

Cruise believes it was her father who raised her to "know that you don't need a man." Who raised her to think of pornography when it came time to make a "list of what I am good at?" Objectification by one man is a shameful disgrace but by one million men is an empowering statistic.

Sunday, January 22, 2017

"Fuck You Dad"


Back in 1960, the ultimate "fuck you, Dad" move was to marry a black guy. A generation of girls brought up in the sterile, sexually repressed 1950's expressed their sexual independence from their fathers in this way.

Ann Dunham gave us a "fuck you, Dad," President, who has hopped into bed with every degenerate regime he could, from Iran, to Venezuela, and Cuba.

Then the 1960's and the sexual revolution unleashed the greatest female sexual anarchy the world has ever known. But women, especially the women who marched in solidarity against Trump yesterday, ignore something very important.

Women only have the right to assemble and speak because men asserted these rights, codified them, and died to protect them.

One of the speakers yesterday was a "woman" named J. Bob Alotta, who runs an LGBT advocacy group called the Astraea Lesbian Foundation For Justice. The current "fuck you, Dad" for girls is to marry another girl.

It's all about "intersectionality" in feminism, now. The black lesbian woman sits on top of the hierarchy now, because she can assert the least privilege and the most oppression.

Nobody ever explains how the lesbian woman's imperative is reconciled with the newest member of the oppressed women's club, the Muslim woman. Muslim activist Linda Sarsour single-handedly made the hijab the unofficial icon of yesterday's women's march. Because Muslim women are so oppressed by their religion, right? No, because Muslim women are so oppressed by western patriarchy.

If Linda Sarsour were concerned about the oppression of women, she would have organized marches in Riyadh or Cairo. The only marches outside of the U.S. were in Western European countries.

It took me awhile to find an image of women's solidarity anywhere else. This is an image of women marching in Accra, Ghana, yesterday. Ghana is 75% Christian, but the reaction of the natives to the crazy white women is unmistakably bewilderment.

Yesterday, Gloria Steinem proclaimed that, "if you [Trump] force Muslims to register, we will all register as Muslims."

Prediction: Girls who need a new, transgressive "fuck you, Dad," will satisfy this impulse by marrying Muslim men. At least then "intersectionality" will meet it's true test, the seventy-ton freight train known as Islam, barreling through an unguarded rail crossing.

Saturday, January 21, 2017

Maher's Pillbillies

Bill Maher ran a segment yesterday that identified a painful cultural crisis, the opiate drug epidemic, and played it for laughs. Entitled, "Pillbillies," Maher trotted out statistics that demonstrated correlation between Trump voters and opioid abuse.

"Did you know that of the 14 states with the highest number of painkiller prescriptions per person, they all went for Trump." It must have been therapeutic for his audience of wounded Hillary voters to hear this, because they clapped enthusiastically.

"So let's stop calling Trump voters idiots and fools, and call them what they are: FUCKING DRUG ADDICTS!" This whipped the audience into a crescendo of applause, and Maher grinned broadly and sat back in his chair. But he wasn't done.

"West Virginia's mascot is a dilated pupil."

That's Jon Meacham enjoying Bill Maher's mocking of fellow Americans, who deserve to be ridiculed, because they voted for Donald Trump.

Jon Meacham is a presidential historian who has won the Pulitzer Prize.

The camera next peered at Keith Olbermann for his reaction shot, and, well, who cares about him? Olbermann has always been unbalanced.

Maher is on his way to making a point, and he does get around to it, after insulting the citizens of Oklahoma and Wisconsin.

"For decades it was us liberals who were accused of destroying the fabric of society with our drug use. Well who's stoned all the time, now? It's not us. We've moved on to kale smoothies."

Maher may be doing kale smoothies, but his generation of hippies normalized drug use. We wouldn't have the drug epidemic today without their cultural influence. And where does the meth come from? By and large, from the loosely-enforced southern border of the United States.

"I'm not saying, Trump voters, that your pain isn't real. I mean, it isn't, but I'm not saying it."

Maher and his generation of baby boomers have borrowed twenty trillion dollars, normalized abortion, glorified single motherhood as iconic feminism, and generally blessed our total cultural disintegration. And then when some of our brothers and sisters try to dull the pain of a life without meaning or purpose, they make fun of us.

That's about as funny as Christmas weekend in Democratic stronghold Chicago.

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Gay Mafia Strikes Again

More people tolerate homosexuals, and more people identify as homosexual, than ever before. The most recent Gallup poll claims to show that 4.1% of Americans identify as LGBT. The cohort that most strongly identifies as LGBT is Millennials.

Millennials (born between 1980 and 1998) reported LGBT identification at 7.3 %, an increase of twenty-five percent (1.5 percentage points) just since 2012. Millennials also help drive general acceptance of homosexual relationships and marriage, with more Americans believing they are "never wrong," than believe they are "always wrong," for the first time.

We have the public school system and the mass media to thank for the changes in attitudes. Television shows like Modern Family falsely portray faggots as totally virtuous, and monogamous. This cultural imperatives of "acceptance" probably explains a great deal of the shift, although one may suspect other, more biological factors. This is a cohort whose mothers and who themselves use hormonal birth control, SSRI, and marijuana, and were also expected to grow up without both male and female role models.

When we are presented with "wholesome" images of homosexual relationships, like cringeworthy Cheerios commercials, the intent is to elicit sympathy to dykes and faggots. But they don't present the whole, shameful picture.

They don't show you the Jennifer Hollidays. If her story was properly contextualized, I have a feeling more people would feel outraged.

First of all, I reject the notion that performing at the inaguration, any inaguration, is, as Kevin Fallon states, "a political act." It's an invitation you don't turn down. But targeting a performer who accepts this invitation is a nakedly political act, and it only comes from the left.

They can't stand anyone who represents popular culture being seen with their political enemies. Homosexuals are the most hostile enforcers of this in-group code. But why target Trump? He is bringing "Caitlyn" Jenner to his inaguration parties, and was famously photographed during the campaign holding a rainbow flag.

It's because of Mike Pence, otherwise known as Trump's impeachment insurance. Fallon points, without attribution, to Pence's "opposition to allocating funding for H.I.V./AIDS patients," and then pulls out his ace, Pence's "support of gay “conversion therapy."

Mike Pence's "support of gay conversion therapy" is based on a statement posted to a campaign website in 2000. In the year 2000, there were probably Democrats who would have endorsed the same thing. The statement read,

"Congress should support the reauthorization of the Ryan White Care Act only after completion of an audit to ensure that federal dollars were no longer being given to organizations that celebrate and encourage the types of behaviors that facilitate the spreading of the HIV virus. Resources should be directed toward those institutions which provide assistance to those seeking to change their sexual behavior."

Mike Pence wasn't referring to homosexual acts, he was referring to the compulsive behaviors that are celebrated in the gay community. Twenty-eight percent of homosexual men have more than 1,000 sexual partners, and those are invariably anonymous and unprotected.

Why is teen smoking treated like a public health crisis, but the large and growing numbers of homosexual men engaging in unprotected sex in public places can't even be criticized?

Saturday, January 14, 2017

Paul Ryan is Joss Whedon's Supervillain

I just had to screen-cap a couple of Joss Whedon's tweets from the last 24 hours. This is some top-shelf content.

Nicole Kidman "earned" this Whedon smack-down because she dared to advise the American people complaining about Donald Trump to just get on with their lives.

"I just say, he’s now elected, and we as a country need to support whoever is the president because that’s what the country’s based on," she said, while pointing out that she is nevertheless "very, very committed to women's issues."

Why didn't Whedon just use an image of Kidman from Stepford Wives if he wanted to convey her as someone robotic? The best observation of Whedon's attack came from Ian Miles Cheong, who tweeted that "Male feminist allies just can't stop themselves from denigrating a woman's appearance the instant she has an opinion contrary to theirs."

But Whedon's Friday Funnies didn't end there. He later tweeted,

Just this past week Martin Shkreli was permanently banned from Twitter for creating a shrine to Teen Vogue writer Lauren Duca. But Joss Whedon's incitement to violence against the man third-in-line to the Presidency goes unchallenged.

Twitter might defend themselves by pointing out the obvious satirical nature of Whedon's tweet, but was it satirical? Perhaps that is just Whedon's "process." Well, if you replace Paul Ryan with his predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, what you have is worthy of a Twitter ban, a knock on the door, and a psychiatric hold.

Twitter might justify their sanction of Whedon's tweet by pointing to his 125,000 followers, each of whom's experience on the platform would be diminished by banning Whedon.

It really tells you who Twitter would rather not use their platform at all.

Friday, January 13, 2017

Kim Burrell Is My Sister

The more I read about Kim Burrell, the more I believe the Holy Spirit was moving through her while she gave a sermon at a Houston church last week. She has endured a hellfire of persecution since then, because she called homosexual acts, "perversions."

Dykes and faggots get really upset when you call them "perverts." But this isn't "hate speech." It's just speech. It's just a word, and the reaction to its negative connotations tells you something about their sense of shame, and how they will defend against that feeling.

They will attack you, and withdraw their invitations to appear, as Ellen DeGeneres did. They will pressure your benefactors to abandon you, and get your radio show canceled.

During her sermon, Burrell said that "the homosexual spirit is one of confusion and delusion, it has deceived many men and women, and it's causing a strain on the body of Christ."

In the city of Houston, churches there are quite aware of the strains put on the body of Christ. Former Houston mayor Annise Parker, an open lesbian, demanded churches in her city turn over their sermons so her minions could comb through them and see if there was any hate speech.

But is calling homosexual acts "perverted" actual hate speech? The word comes from old French pervers, meaning "unnatural, abnormal, contrary." Ninety-six percent of adults identify as heterosexual. That is the norm, and therefore it is homosexuality which is abnormal. Also, the natural purpose of sexual attraction is pair-bonding, which leads to procreation and child-rearing. Therefore, a union which cannot yield offspring is indeed unnatural.

Perhaps Ellen felt stung by the connotation of the word, "pervert," which is "wicked." Ellen could have showed what a righteous, kind person she was, just by bringing Burrell on her show anyway.

Ellen did bring Burrell's singing partner, Pharrell, on to her show, and Pharrell said, "we all have to get used to everyone's differences." No, fuck you, I don't have to do shit, Pharrell. He continued, "this is a big, beautiful, gigantic, colorful world, and it only works with inclusion and empathy."

Ellen responded with, "yep," while nodding in agreement, and joining the audience in applauding Pharrell. For Pharrell and Ellen, inclusion and empathy are a one-way street, and do not apply to Kim Burrell. They could have scored a lot of empathy points by bringing her on the show anyway, but no.

Interestingly, Pharrell may be nominated for an Academy Award next week for his work on the soundtrack to the movie, Hidden Figures. Kim Burrell and Pharrell performed a duet for the movie called, I See A Victory. If the Hidden Figures soundtrack is indeed nominated, the "anti-homophobic" persecution against Burrell will only grow, possibly including sickly-looking faggots criticizing her from the Oscar podium.

If the "anti-homophobic" crusaders do continue to criticize Burrell, you can expect it will borrow from the template used by Stereo Williams of The Daily Beast. Williams, who is black, titled his essay, Pastor Kim Burrell’s Homophobic Tirade Is Nothing New—Just Ask Mike Pence.

Williams, whose Twitter location refers to "NYC by way of Fort Valley, GA," writes that "many in America share the hateful views of Kim Burrell—and that needs to change." And who gets name-dropped by the rural son of the Bible Belt? Mike Pence.

Stereo Williams has probably spent more than a little time in the pews of a Baptist church, and on some level understands that to criticize "homophobia," he will have to drag his righteous brothers and sisters through the crap. He quotes Toni Braxton as correctly identifying Burrell's upbringing, specifically her time spent in "black churches." But then Stereo veers away from that, and goes on to repeat the tropes about Mike Pence and conversion therapy.

In his last sentence, Stereo Williams just comes out and says that Kim Burrell's speech was "hate." Truth is hate then, and add Stereo Williams to the list of those who are deceived.

Thursday, January 05, 2017

Strong Enough For A Gender-Queer, But Made For A Cisgender Female


The hilariously surnamed Alanna Vagianos, who was possibly born with a vag, is the Women's Editor at The Huffington Post. If you carefully scrutinize this photograph from a recent editor's meeting, you may notice that possessing a vag seems to be a minimum requirement for HuffPo's editorial board.

Ms. Vagianos published an article today about an advertisement for Secret antiperspirant, Women Prep For Workplace Sexism In Spot-On Deodorant Ad. The ad depicts two females rehearsing their product pitch in an elevator. They seem to work on the web presence side of a non-tech firm, based on their rapid-fire role play.

"Web visits?"   "One point two million."

"Who coded this?"   "We did."


The tagline at the end, "Ash and Emma's pitch adds two more girls to the boys' club." A woman's voice-over at the end says "Secret: stress tested for women." I didn't really see evidence of "workplace sexism' in the spot. Perhaps Vagianos longs for the dark days of 1971 when women like Mary Tyler Moore were seen as shattering cultural norms.

If anything, the workplace sexism apparent at HuffPo's editorial board is increasingly the norm. Feminist writers think that men should be jumping at the chance to work in female dominated fields like nurse practitioner, even though they pay a lot less.

I wonder if feminists will ever realize the reason those jobs pay a lot less is because women can do them. Probably not, because the urge to be self-congratulatory over her transgressiveness is a feminist imperative. Maybe that explains why so many men and boys just want to quit being male, and join the girl's club.

Vagianos links to other Secret ad videos, and points out that they center "around themes of women’s empowerment." One of them, ("possibly our favorite"), features "a young trans woman finding the courage to leave a bathroom stall."

The opening images portray two young women entering a restroom and walking up to the mirror. Notice the stall doors behind them? They are designed like plantation shutters that aren't super private. What woman wants to take a dump in a bathroom stall where anyone can walk in and look at her? But wait. It gets better (worse).

There is a transsexual male lurking in the bathroom stall. He's being quiet as a mouse as he peeks at the women. Oh, wait, xe is just anxious? That's understandable, because when xe emerges from the stall, those women are going to scream.

The tagline at the end is priceless. "Dana finds the courage to show that there's no wrong way to be a woman."

And this is the "favorite" at Huffington Post? What if you replaced the two adult women in the restroom with two seven-year old girls? What then?

TED

 BUNDY WAS PROBABL TRANS NOOBODY TALKS ABOUT THIS...THEY/THEM LEFT DETAILED NOTES ON THERE/THEM OBSESSESH WITH THE VAG