Monday, February 27, 2017

Best Gay Picture

I only saw one Oscar-nominated movie this year. It was the Denis Villeneuve-directed Arrival, which was nominated for Best Picture. Amy Adams owned this movie, and should have been nominated, too.

The reason Arrival pulled me into the theater was the inherently pro-life message of the movie. By learning the alien language, Louise (Adams), re-wires her brain, and it allows her to see the future. In this future, she can see that someday she will have a daughter, but she will also bury her daughter before it's time.

Knowing this, she willingly becomes pregnant anyway.

I've been thinking about this concept, that learning a different language can re-wire a person's brain. What a great way to understand the behavior of the cultural left. It's not an unborn baby! It's a clump of cells!

Also, masculine behavior, like being strong and protective, is interpreted as "toxic." It would explain why an Amanda Marcotte could maintain adult relationships yet still seem totally unhinged. We are witnessing a hybridization.

The legacy media is hyping the mix-up of the Best Picture announcement. The presenters announced La-La Land, by mistake. Like anyone cares or was still watching at that point. They may have averted a racial crisis, however. Black Twitter is extremely pleased that the white movie lost to the black one.

Let's be clear, and vouch that Moonlight, isn't a black movie, it's a sodomite movie. Calling it a black movie is like calling Brokeback Mountain a cowboy movie. But if you watched the trailer for this movie, you might not know that part. The depictions of faggotry are missing. This is a movie that belongs at Landmark Cinema, or whoever presents art-house movies in your area. The images of grown black men kissing each other are not in the trailer. They realized that would be repulsive to movie-goers.

And this movie is going to go wide? These people are speaking a different language.

But you've got to appreciate the headline at Variety, Oscars: With Historic Moonlight Win, the Academy Embraces Empathy Over Escapism.

No, they're pushing the idea that this evolutionary dead end is fashionable.

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Extreme Toddler Vetting

Did you know that you are more likely to be killed by lightning than by a terrorist? Only if you qualify that statement by making our hypothetical terrorist foreign-born. Actually, make that foreign-born terrorist from one of the seven countries Trump banned travel from. And don't count those people who were self-radicalized, only those who were trained at an official ISIS camp from one of those countries.

It turns out that lightning strikes killed thirty-eight people in 2016. Wasn't there a single attack last year involving gay Puerto Ricans that killed 49? I guess it doesn't count for one of those reasons above.

The average number of people killed by lightning each year is thirty-one. And the average number of Americans killed every year by Islamist terrorists is less than that (remember that the start year has to be 2002 - something happened in 2001 that screws up the averages).

The main problem with this argument is that lightning doesn't have the will to kill you.

There are other problems with this argument as well. It seems to say that it doesn't make sense to take precautions against admitting people who may have homicidal tendencies. "When we change that means the terrorists win," they will repeat as if repetition makes this truth.

But we take precautions against being struck by lightning. You tell people that if they are in a thunderstorm, to get to shelter. Put the golf clubs back in the bag and head to the clubhouse. Stay in your car (the wheels are rubber and provide a path to ground).

Another cause of death more likely than being killed by a foreign-born, foreign-trained ISIS terrorist from Syria, is getting shot by a toddler.

That's why we lock up guns when toddlers are around.

Sunday, February 05, 2017

Ivanka


This is Shannon Coulter. She wills the aggregate malevolence inherent in the radical left to her own ends.

Shannon Coulter leads the #GrabYourWallet campaign against Ivanka Trump. She has roused her fifty thousand twitter followers to initiate boycotts of Ivanka's product line at Shoes.com, Bellacor, Belk, Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom.

Someday this smirk will be wiped off her face. I won't be around to see it, but it will happen.

I guess I feel about Ivanka the way many people feel about Beyonce. Ivanka is royalty. There is an energy in the universe that allows prosperity to manifest in certain people. They deserve it.

But the demon-possessed like Coulter would begrudge Ivanka her due, because she dares to support the man that made it all possible for her. Such a man, her father, makes much seem possible for many people. Such are royalty.

They would have Ivanka become like Patty Davis Reagan. But they can't have that, so they bully her, and remind her that she can't sit at the cool kids' table. And when faggots like Daniel Goldstein, "husband" to Hunter College professor Matthew Lasner, harass Ivanka on an airplane while she's trying to get somewhere with her kids, it's all good.

What a Shannon.

And then there is Scott Dworkin. A week ago, his bio informed any and all that he would contact your employer if he noticed your reactionary opinions. A week ago, he bragged to his 57,000 followers that he harassed the person answering the phone at Mar a Lago.

Now if I have this straight, Shannon Coulter and Scott Dworkin are engaging in targeted harassment using Twitter. Somehow this isn't a violation of the Terms of Service? Yet Milo Yiannopoulos tells his followers that Leslie Jones and Ghostbusters is a dud, and somehow that is a TOS violation.

Don't Call Me Daughter

The secular American holiday is upon us, and we are reminded that, "the ads are the best part." Fear and envy are projected onto consumers to grow bottom lines. The contest on the field is secondary to the feminist imperative of disbursing information about modes of gathering.

Lady Gaga's pudenda must be an integral part of the message.

Automaker Audi wants to grow their brand by reminding women to be angry. Their halftime ad uses a little girl competing in a Fury Road -style downhill cart race, with a male voice-over, as he agonizes about "what do I tell my daughter?"

"Do I tell her that her grandpa is worth more than her grandma...?"

The male voice-over continues, "...that her dad is worth more than her mom?"

"Do I tell her that despite her education, her drive, her skills, her intelligence, she will automatically be valued as less than every man she ever meets?"

Yes, you should tell her that even if she becomes a pediatric neurosurgeon, she will be less valuable to society than the stoner that services her pool every other week.

Like I said, this is a weak attempt to grow the brand. It does nothing to reinforce the decision made by people who already purchased Audi. There are plenty of people driving an Audi that are experiencing buyer's remorse, because their brand has been caught up in the Volkswagen emissions scandal.

Audi owners can at least take comfort that they probably won't get angry notes left on their windshields, as progressive Portland drivers of VW have.

Audi's big mistake is conflating "value" and "worth" with women's workplace earnings expectations. Society has always valued women more than men, because men are expendable. An individual woman and her fertility are worth more than men, and always have been. Unless that fertility, that nurturing capability, becomes a burden.

What do i tell my daughter? I tell her that I expect her to be good.

TED

 BUNDY WAS PROBABL TRANS NOOBODY TALKS ABOUT THIS...THEY/THEM LEFT DETAILED NOTES ON THERE/THEM OBSESSESH WITH THE VAG