To call Moore a feminist is a bit of an understatement. Moore is an embittered, haggard blight on humanity. Her tweet on the subject is a little bit of a feint.
The reader sees that a feminist a) admits being wrong, and b) may have got the whole men thing wrong. Perhaps she's coming around on this whole men thing! Er, no.Fun!! Suzanne Moore: Why I was wrong about men https://t.co/8G9sBr3ZRU
— suzanne moore (@suzanne_moore) September 5, 2016
She does get credit for openly saying what most feminists wish they could say, that, "I think that any intelligent woman hates men."
Her column begins with a flippant comment that would end a man's career if he said it about women. "Men. You can’t live with them. You can’t shoot them. Well, you can, but this is the New Statesman." This type of homicidal ideation is known as the primary process.
Most people restrain themselves from expressing fantasies like this, because they know that it is coming from a childish, irrational place. This suggests that she may be developmentally stuck in childhood, when her parents split up.
Moore's malice extends to all men ("#YesAllMen") and even boys, "who were abused at public school."
She asks herself rhetorically, "You can’t hate them individually, can you?" Her answer is "You know what? I can." Moore denies any feelings of personal bitterness, claiming this is merely "class hatred. As a class," she writes, "I hate men."
Try to imagine this type of hatred directed at any protected class. Would it be permissible to express the desire to "want to see this class broken," if the class were single mothers, or homosexual adoptive parents, or black people? Of course not.
But the world that men built tolerates such foolishness. The men that laid the pipe that carries away her shit every morning toil on with little regard to the contempt they are held in. The boys that went into the breech over the centuries now lay at rest as women like Moore tear down the institutions they died to uphold.
Hell hath no fury.
No comments:
Post a Comment